Star Bound Magazine

Trade-offs

Cast It or Print It

Three ways to make a hundred thousand habitat panels. What each one buys you, what each one costs you, and where each one belongs. The first entry in a department that exists to write both columns down.

Respond to this article

Write to the editor

Comments are published in the next update.


Every idea in this magazine buys you something and costs you something. Most articles argue for the idea, and the cost gets a sentence near the end. This department is where the cost gets the same space as the idea. Each entry takes one decision, lays out the options, and writes down what you gain and what you give up with each. No winner is declared unless the arithmetic declares one.

The first decision is the one that came out of One Press or Ten Thousand: how do you make a hundred thousand ten-inch panels?

Option one: cast aluminum in a giant press

This is the Giga Press route. Molten aluminum is injected into a die with dozens of panel cavities, the clamp holds it shut, and every few seconds the die opens on a full tray of panels.1

You gain: volume that nothing else touches. Tens of thousands of panels a week from one plant. Every panel identical, because they all came out of the same die. Cheap per part once the die is paid for.

You give up: the material. It has to be aluminum, because no die survives molten stainless. Aluminum is lighter and weaker, and it does not have the fatigue life for a wall that cycles under load for fifty years. You also give up the network: one plant, one die, one supplier, and if the plant stops, everything stops.

Where it belongs: the outer wall. The bumper. The one that gets hit and is supposed to be cheap to replace.

Option two: print stainless in the garages, sinter at the yard

This is the A Thousand Garages route as corrected in Cold, Vacuum, and a Hundred Thousand Joints: a garage printer makes a green part from steel powder in a binder, and the yard furnace, press, and coupon test make the strength.

You gain: stainless, with the strength and fatigue life the structural walls need. A supply chain with ten thousand nodes that no single failure can stop. A part that anyone with a six-hundred-dollar printer can make, which means anyone can also test one.

You give up: speed and consistency. Ten thousand printers means ten thousand slightly different printers, and the scatter in the parts has to be found and driven out by testing rather than designed out by the die.2 The part comes out of the furnace porous and needs hot isostatic pressing to close it, and it shrinks twenty percent on the way, which every drawing has to allow for. The yard does more work than the parent article admitted.

Where it belongs: the structural walls. The ones that carry the spin and the air.

Option three: press dry powder

The century-old route: steel powder pressed in a die at up to fifty tons per square inch, then sintered.3

You gain: no binder, no debinding step, a denser green part than printing gives you, and a process every powder-metal shop on Earth already runs.

You give up: almost everything else. The pressure is per square inch of part, so a ten-inch panel wants thirteen hundred to twenty-two hundred tons all by itself, and even the biggest press ever built only makes three to five of them a stroke.4 It does not scale with the machine. It is not a garage process and it is not a mass-production process either. It is a good way to make a bushing.

Where it belongs: possibly nowhere in this design. Possibly in the yard, for test coupons, where a dense pressed reference part is useful to compare the printed ones against.

Where it lands

The decision is not one press or ten thousand. It is one press for the aluminum wall and ten thousand garages for the stainless walls, and the two are not competing. The cost of that answer is that the habitat now has at least two supply chains, two qualification programs, and two kinds of joint, one cast and one printed, that have to meet somewhere at an edge. That edge is a design problem nobody has drawn yet.

The other cost is that this whole table rests on a number nobody has measured: what a printed stainless joint actually holds, and how much it varies. Until fifty of them have been broken, every line above is an argument. That is why the press test comes before the wall drawings, and not after.

From one explorer to another, we appreciate you reading this far. We are excited about what this endeavor brings, and we would like you along for the rest of it.

Come join us. Because we are Star Bound.

John LangEditor

Ideas in Star Bound are published open — take them, build them better. Our open proposal.

Write to the editor. If you have comments, please write to us — I read every one.

Write to the editor

Comments

Star Bound is not a forum, so comments run the old way: if you have comments, please write to us at hello@starboundmagazine.com and they will be published here in the next update, with your name on them. Say if you would rather stay anonymous.

No comments posted on this one yet. Yours could be the first.

A note on where this comes from. I am not a metallurgist, a spacecraft engineer, or a degreed engineer of any kind. But I am a practical one, with more than forty years in heavy industrial construction: welding, millwright work, hydraulics, mining, and thirty-three years of electrical construction and commissioning on the North Slope of Alaska, in a place that punishes anything built wrong. Much of that time I have worked as a field engineer, which means I am the one standing in front of the equipment when the drawing turns out to be wrong, and the fix has to be made on the spot, with what is on hand, and has to work the first time. Anyone who has done that long enough learns that a lot of engineering gets corrected in the field by people with more experience than the people who drew it. That is the eye I bring to these subjects: not what should work on paper, but what actually gets built, and what breaks. The facts I take from other people are footnoted so you can check them and read further. The ideas built on top of those facts are my own, and I would rather see them knocked down by somebody who knows better than left standing because nobody looked.

Sources

  1. IDRA Giga Press: 5,600 to 6,200 tons clamping force; a single casting replacing an assembly of up to 70 parts. InsideEVs, Learn About Tesla's Giga Press From IDRA, January 2022. ↩
  2. Binder-jetted 316L: about 3 percent initial porosity, pores clustered in layers perpendicular to the build direction. Roth et al., Rate-dependent strength and ductility of binder jetting 3D-printed stainless steel 316L, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021. ↩
  3. Powder compacted in a rigid die at up to 50 tons per square inch. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Industry Facts. ↩
  4. Editor's arithmetic, laid out in note 9 of One Press or Ten Thousand: 43.3 sq in × 30 to 50 tsi = 1,300 to 2,165 tons per panel; 2.8 to 4.6 panels per stroke at 6,000 tons. ↩

The assignment of each process to a wall is my own proposal, built on the four-wall stack described in One Press or Ten Thousand. The gains and costs listed are the ones I could see; the ones I could not are exactly what this department is for. If you know a cost I left off the table, that is the letter I want.

More from Star Bound